Welcome Catherine Roy!

McCuaig Desrochers LLP is pleased to welcome Catherine Roy as our incoming articling student.  Catherine completed her undergraduate degree at the University of Alberta, Campus Saint-Jean, earning a Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction before pursuing her Juris Doctor, French Common Law Section, at the University of Ottawa.   

During her time in law school, Catherine worked as a Legal Researcher for AJEFA (Association des juristes d’expression française de l’Alberta) and served as the Human Resources Manager for the Volume 57 Senior Board of the Ottawa Law Review.  She also worked as an Assistant and Associate Editor for the Ottawa Law Review.    

Outside of her professional life, Catherine is passionate about community service, notably the Franco-Albertan community.  She was a mentor for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Edmonton & Area for two years and was an actor in the Festival Flying Canoe Volant for seven years.  She enjoys travelling, reading, pilates and playing board and video games. 

Catherine is fluent in both English and French.   

Trends in Human Rights: Increasing Frequency of Costs Awards

Written by: Justin C. Haack

The Alberta Human Rights Tribunal (“Tribunal”) rarely awards costs in its decisions. This blog will discuss three recent decisions where costs were awarded against a complainant or a respondent as a result of misconduct during the proceedings. 

Costs against Respondents

Nielsen v Sparks, 2026 AHRC 4 (“Nielsen”)

In this very recent decision, the Tribunal awarded the Complainant $5,000 in costs. The parties were previously in a romantic relationship that turned sour.[1] After the relationship ended, the Respondent, Sparks, filed a complaint against Nielsen’s company (the “Sparks Complaint”).[2] Nielsen responded by filing her own complaint alleging The Sparks Complaint was frivolous, vexatious, and with malicious intent.[3] The Tribunal agreed, finding the Sparks Complaint was made dishonestly, for an ulterior purpose, and was motived by spite and ill-will.[4]

The Tribunal also found the underlying motive of the Sparks Complaint was to harm the Complainant, finding he also provided false evidence, forged documents, and attempted to deceive the Tribunal.[5] Overall, this behaviour amounted to an abuse of process and was deserving of sanction.[6] As a result, the Tribunal awarded the Complainant general damages and $5,000 in costs.

Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong v Gursoy, 2024 AHRC 81(“Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong”)

The underlying decision is well known for its record setting general damages award where the Tribunal awarded a total of $230,000 in general damages to three complainants. The Tribunal found the Respondent had engaged in sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.[7] A link to the decision may be found here.

After the hearing on the merits the Tribunal awarded $10,000 in costs payable to each of the three Complainants because of the Respondent’s behaviour at the hearing – which was found to be so egregious the Tribunal removed him from the proceedings.[8]

Costs against Complainants

Shodunke v Paladin Security Group Ltd., 2025 AHRC 2 (“Shodunke”)

The Tribunal ordered $25,000 in costs against the Complainant after finding his complaint was meritless, vexatious, and due to his behaviour during the proceedings. This included findings that he was dishonest with the Tribunal and that he failed to disclose relevant and material information.[9]

We note in another decision involving Mr. Shodunke, the Tribunal declared Mr. Shodunke to be a vexatious litigant and barred him from filing any more complaints with the Tribunal.[10] This was an extraordinary remedy and in response to several unsuccessful complaints and a pattern of similar conduct in Ontario.[11]

Take away for Employers

Although an award of costs is rare, the Shodunke and Nielsen decisions may provide some comfort to employers when faced with vexatious, frivolous, or meritless complaints, or receive a complaint from an apparent vexatious litigant. Shodunke and Nielsen demonstrate that when faced with these improper complaints, the Tribunal will intervene and award costs when a party abuses its proceedings.

However, Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong is a warning for employers. The Tribunal will not tolerate misconduct by the employer’s representative before or during a hearing; the representative may be removed from the proceedings, and this could result in costs against the employer. 

If you have received a human rights complaint, McCuaig Desrochers LLP is available to support and represent respondents in those proceedings.

This article is informative and is not legal advice and legal advice should be obtained for your unique circumstances.


[1] Nielsen v Sparks, 2026 AHRC 4 at para 10. [Nielsen].

[2] Ibid at paras 1-2.

[3] Ibid at para 2.

[4] Ibid at para 2.

[5] Ibid at paras 22-23.

[6] Nielsen at para 39.

[7] See Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong v Gursoy, 2024 AHRC 45.

[8] Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong v Gursoy, 2024 AHRC 82 at para 10 [Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong].

[9] Shodunke v Paladin Security Group Ltd., 2025 AHRC 2 [Shodunke]

[10] Shodunke v Mercredi et al, 2025 AHRC 58 at paras 67 and 68.

[11] Ibid, at paras 51, and 56-58

Articling Students for articles commencing in 2027/2028

At McCuaig Desrochers LLP, the recruitment and training of articling students is a high priority. Our goal is to recruit ambitious students who want to become successful, resilient lawyers.

Type of Work & Articling Experience

McCuaig Desrochers LLP is a mid-sized, full-service law firm. Our practice areas are wide-ranging, including business law, civil litigation, administrative law, wills & estates, family law, construction, immigration, and employment law. Please refer to our website for more details about our specific practice areas.

We treat the articling year as period of additional, practical education. We strive to expose our articling students to the widest possible range of legal subject matters and various modes dispute resolution (both adjudicative and alternative), and to foster sound business practices at the highest ethical standards. Students will not follow a specific rotation but will instead receive assignments from all partners of the firm, coordinated and closely guided by their principal. We pride ourselves on supporting our students’ professional formation, allowing them to develop their own skills and interests by drawing on the diverse expertise of all practitioners at the firm.

Because we view the articling process an investment in both the firm’s and the student’s futures, we place the focus on education and obtaining experience. The student will have considerable client contact and courtroom experience in addition to more traditional articling assignments such as research and drafting. We do not formally track billable hour targets during the articling period, focusing instead on educational experiences through direct involvement in client files.

Please do not hesitate to contact us or ask in an interview about our generous benefits package and policies designed to support our students and associates through the changing stages of life. Feel free to reach out to one of our current associates to speak with them about their experience!

PREP Course

We are also committed to providing articling students with adequate time to fulfill the requirements of the Law Society, including the PREP course. As a McCuaig Desrochers’ associate explains:

As the time required to complete the CPLED [now PREP] assignments varies each week, McCuaig Desrochers’ approach is perfectly suited. The flexibility and support received by all lawyers in the firm ensures that you manage both your work and course commitments.”

Continuing Education

We recognize that a professional education never ends. Following the articling year, we have a formal mentorship program that matches each associate with a partner-mentor to assist the associate in their ongoing professional and business development. Associates are encouraged to continue their legal education while engaging in general practice and perhaps developing one or more areas of concentration over the first five years of practice.

We offer universal membership in the Canadian Bar Association, and we encourage associates’ participation in multiple sections and pertinent seminars, including joining the executive of CBA sections of interest to the associate. Associates have yearly budgets for various other continuing legal education opportunities such as webinars, LESA seminars, conferences and others.

Candidate Qualifications

McCuaig Desrochers LLP is a firm deeply rooted in the Edmonton community. We are looking for students who either already have, or are willing to develop, strong ties to our community. We encourage all lawyers at our firm to involve themselves in our diverse local community. Such involvement expands our perspectives and allows us to improve client services and attract diverse clientele.  

We are looking for colleagues who are intelligent, hard-working, and dedicated. Maturity is as valuable as youthful exuberance. Experiences outside of the law or formal education are also important to us and welcomed in our applicants.

A strong academic record is important, both undergraduate and in law. Each year we find that those candidates chosen for interview usually have an above-average academic standing.

Ability in another language or another discipline is an asset, but not a requirement. We have several practitioners with an extensive Franco-Canadian practice, and one lawyer who provides services in German.

Court Students Welcome

Many of our partners and associates have articled with the various levels of the Alberta Courts. We encourage applications from students who will be articling with the Courts, and we will tailor our articling program accordingly for them.

The Application Process

We subscribe to the Law Society’s recruitment process. We carefully screen each application we receive. We regret that we cannot grant personal interviews to all applicants.  In order to ensure consistency in the application process, we request that ALL applications for an articling position contain the following minimal information:

  • Copies of University transcripts, including undergraduate and law school grades available at time of application (updated to the end of the most recent semester);
  • A resumé showing academic career, employment experience, other activity such as travel, and unpaid volunteer work or community service;
  • A listing of significant achievements, awards, and special skills such as languages or professional designations;
  • A description of any roots or connection to any community, and in particular the Edmonton community, noting any connections to business, cultural, or social organizations;
  • References are very helpful. Please provide contact information for your references and/or a note of their relationship to you, if not providing a reference letter; and
  • One or more telephone numbers and an e-mail address where we may contact you.

Candidates may apply through the viLawPortal from May 11, 2026 to May 19, 2026.

Candidates may also apply by email any time up to and including May 19, 2026 by submitting their applications to Megan Dawson, at mdawson@mccuaig.com

All candidates are asked to submit their application as a single PDF document, and not to email an assortment of separate attachments.

Please ensure you have provided your complete application by the deadline date. We cannot guarantee we will review any applications that are received after this date.

Please note that McCuaig Desrochers LLP does not hire summer students. We encourage interested law students to apply to our articling program as outlined above.

Application deadline for 2026 Articling Recruitment:Interview Dates:Contact:
May 19, 2026, if submitted by email Between May 11-19, if submitted via viLawPortalJune 1-8, 2026Megan L. Dawson

Congratulations Robert Curtis!

McCuaig Desrochers LLP would like to congratulate Robert Curtis, KC on his retirement after 52 years of practice. 

Rob was called to the Alberta Bar in 1974, the NWT Bar in 1980, and he was appointed King’s Counsel in 2000. He devoted considerable time to legal education and professional service, including acting as a sessional instructor at the University of Alberta Faculty of Law and serving the Canadian Bar Association in a variety of capacities, including at the national level. He has dedicated his distinguished career to helping his clients and community. 

We are deeply grateful for Rob’s commitment and leadership to McCuaig Desrochers LLP and wish him the very best in this exciting next chapter!

Partners recognized in 2026 edition of Best Lawyers Canada

McCuaig Desrochers is proud to announce that four of its distinguished lawyers have been recognized by their peers for inclusion in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada®.

Please join us in congratulating the following Partners:

Pierre Desrochers, K.C. – Commercial Leasing Law, Corporate Law, and Real Estate Law (recognized in Best Lawyers since 2023)

Nathan Po – Immigration Law (recognized in Best Lawyers since 2018)

Justin Kingston – Corporate Law, Real Estate Law

Jeffrey Arsenault (Ones to Watch in Canada) – Labour and Employment Law

We are proud of our team’s achievements which reflect our firm’s commitment to excellence.

Congratulations Eky Singh!

Congratulations to Eky Singh on being called to the Alberta bar! This significant professional milestone reflects Eky’s hard work, perseverance and dedication throughout her articles.

We are happy to announce that Eky will be continuing on at McCuaig Desrochers as an associate.

Pictured below is Eky with Shaun Wetmore and The Honourable Justice Ahluwalia.